Print preview Close

Showing 1933 results

Archival description
John Keenlyside Legal Research Collection
Print preview Hierarchy View:

617 results with digital objects Show results with digital objects

Wilson v. Curtis

File consists of six documents: declaration; affidavit of S. Mills; plaintiff's evidence in support of claim; affidavit of J. Wilson; bill of costs; judgment. Case regards goods and materials sold and delivered by the Plaintiff for the Defendant and cost of the suit totaling $630.10.

McNeil et al v. Moffat et al

File consists of nine documents: Affidavit of Young; Summons; Affidavit of G. Jay Jr.; Affidavit of E. Johnson; Notice of Motion for Decree; Affidavit of Moffat; Affidavit of McNeil; Report; Bill of Complaint regarding the settlement of the estate of the late W.H. McNeil and as to what the Plaintiff and the Defendants are respectively entitled to as outlined in the Bill of Complaint

Selleck v. Reed Bros. and Company

File consists of 11 documents: Writ of Summons and Affidavit of Service; Judgment by Default of Plea; (2) Affidavit of C.E. Pooley; Bill of Costs; (4) Summons; Affidavit of Selleck action is brought for the recovery of $939.43 for money paid by the Plaintiff for the Defendants at their request and for money found to be due from the Defendants to the Plaintiff on accounts stated between them.

Johnson vs. Mayereau and Causasa

Affidavit of T. Davie; (2) Summons; Affidavit of H. Homewood; Bond; Notice; Statement of Claim

-Plaintiff claims $500 for damages; that the Defendant seized and took the Plaintiff's good, household furniture, pictures, kitchen utensils, shotgun, etc. and carried them away and disposed of them for their own use.

Roberts vs. Woodcock

Affidavit of J. Roberts; Bail piece; Writ of Summons.

-Plaintiff claims $360 for debt and $17.50 for costs for work and labour done by the Plaintiff for the Defendant as the hired servant of the Defendant.

Strouss vs. Oppenheimer at al.

Affidavit of C. Strouss; Petition of Plaintiff; Bill of Complaint.

-Defendants are indebted to the Plaintiff for $5,799.62 principal and interest due on unpaid goods and merchandise advanced to the Defendants at their request.

McNeil v. McNeil

File consists of seven documents: summons to proceed; affidavit of R. Cridge and T. Alsop; affidavit of J.R. Hett; affidavit of E. Johnson; affidavit of G. Blenkinsop; order for resurvey and partition; decree. Case regards a dispute arising out of the last will and testament of Mr. McNeil involving guardianship of infant children and division of property.

Selleck v. Reed Bros.

File consists of 2 documents: Declaration; Record. Plaintiff claims $1,250 for principal and interest due on money lent to the Defendants at their request and on accounts stated between them.

Marvin v. Stuart

File consists of six documents: plaintiff's bill of costs; affidavit of C. Pooley; bill for service of writ; judgment by default; summons; affidavit of service. Case regards the Plaintiff's claim of $230.00 principal and interest due as holder of a promissary note.

The British Columbia Investors Loan Society vs. Baynes Sound Colliery Company Ltd.

Bill of Costs; Replication; Affidavit of S.P. Mills; Amended Account; Affidavit of Mr. Thomson; Summons; Affidavit of C.W.R. Thomson; Appointment of Mssrs. Crake and Jackson; Affidavit of R.E. Jackson; Bill of Complaint; Chief Clerk Notes.

-Defendants are indebted to the Plaintiffs for $18,560 for principal and interest due on an account between them for the conveyance of land in the District of nelson, Vancouver Island (1,064 acres). The Defendants are in possession of the said premises but have not paid their debt.

McWha v. Cain

File consists of five documents: (2) comment and evidence; correspondence/appointment; notice of appearance; consent to an order. Case regards unpaid promissory notes owed to the Plaintiff for $251.

Tilbury v. Ward

File consists of 5 documents: (2) Affidavit of Tilbury; Judges Order; Affidavit of W.A. Edwards; Writ of Summons. Plaintiff claims that the Defendant is indebted to him for $115.73 for work and labour done by him for the Defendant at his request. The Plaintiff is a veterinary surgeon.

Kelly v. Moss

File consists of 2 documents: Writ of Summons; Affidavit of Service. Plaintiff claims $156.43 for debt and $40 for costs for goods supplied to the Defendants.

Woodcock v. Sehl et al

File consists of 7 documents: Interrogatories; (2) Affidavit of W. Pollard; Bill of Complaint; Affidavit of J. Hett; Answer of Defendant Sehl; Affidavit of J. Sehl. The Plaintiff is a trader and fish carver on the northwest coast of B.C. The Plaintiff and the Defendants had entered into an agreement for the purpose of prospecting and carrying on a general mining business in co-partnership. The partnership dissolved and the Plaintiff claims that the Defendant is indebted to the partnership for $500.

Wilson vs. Humphreys

Summons; Affidavit of Plaintiff; Costs; Examination of Humphreys; Order; Writ of Summons; Affidavit of Service; Judgement by Default.

-The plaintiff had recovered a judgment against the Defendant for $105.50 due on an unpaid promissory note and the costs of the suit. The said judgment remains unsatisfied.

Bell vs. Holbrook

Receipt for $346 - Exhibit "G"; Evidence of H.V. Edmonds.

-Receipt of money from H. Holbrook for which was realized by sale of lots for payment of municipal taxes. Evidence is also regarding the taxes owed and assessed.

Dietz v. Nelson

File consists of seven documents: receipt of $1,000 out of court; statement of account from Moody, Nelson and Co.; answers of H. Nelson; summons; certificate of payment into court; affidavit of Edwin Johnson; affidavit of H. Nelson. Case regarding the dissolution of a co-partnership between parties for carrying on the business of lumbering in Burrard Inlet, Plaintiff claiming $8,064.82 owed to him by the Defendant.

Deas v. Deas

File consists of three documents: (2) Affidavit of Service; Judgment Roll; Bill of Costs. Plaintiff claims $3,000 for past wages due to him from the Defendant as hired servant and money due on accounts stated between them

McWha et al v. Cameron

File consists of 5 documents: Affidavit to Hold to Bail; Summons; Judgement Roll; Judges Order for Capia; Affidavit of McWha. Plaintiff claims that the Defendant is indebted to him for $350 for which he received judgment for that amount. The Plaintiff charges that the Defendant is concealing his property in order to avoid payment of the debt. The original judgement was obtained for several unpaid promissory notes with the Defendant.

Rawling v. Eickhoff

File consists of four documents: petition to appoint; affidavit of R. Rawling; affidavit of R. Hett; record. Case regards Plaintiff charing $1,000 for damages for slander in that the Defendant falsely and maliciously spoke and published words stating that the Plaintiff had stoled a pair of trousers from the Defendant. See 18-57 for more.

Bell v. Holbrook

File consists of ten documents: affidavit of H.M. Bell; replication; (2) summons; affidavit of W. Polland; affidavit of A.E. Davie; supplemental answers; answers to interrogatories; affidavit of Holbrook; affidavit of H.F. Heisterman.

The Eureka Silver Mining Company and the Victorian Mining Company v. Mr. Teague

File consists of one document: bill of complaint. Teague, a collector, advertising the sale of the mining companies' properties due to unpaid taxes of $1,553.75 (Eureka) and $931.25 (Victoria), alleging that the lands are liable to the tax imposed by the Mineral Act of 1878. Plaintiffs allege that the real state is not held under the Act or any other gold mining act. They order to restrain Teague for selling their property and to pay the costs of the suit.

Dyke v. Sehl and Woodcock

File consists of seven documents: Affidavit of J. Sehl; Judgment by Default; Affidavit of Dyke; Affidavit of Woodcock; Bill of Costs; Summons; Affidavit of Service. Plaintiff claims $105 as balance due for work and services rendered by the Plaintiff to the Defendant

Kalston v. Drabble

File consists of four documents: Judgment by Default; Bill of Costs; Summons; Affidavit of Service. Plaintiff claims $226.25 principal and interest due to him as the holder of an unpaid promissory note with the Defendant

Price v. Fletcher et al

File consists of 2 documents: Judgement; Costs of Judgement of Non-Prosecution. The Plaintiff was a saloonkeeper in Dennis Creek, Cassiar, and he claims that the Defendants converted to their own use and wrongfully deprived the Plaintiff of the Plaintiff's goods, a tent-house where he ran his business out of. The Plaintiff is claiming $5,000.

Saunders v. Herring

File consists of 3 documents: Writ of Summons; Affidavit of Service; Judgement by Default. Plaintiff claims $505 principal and interest due to him as the holder of a promissory note from the Defendant.

Results 151 to 200 of 1933