Showing 1933 results

Archival description
University of British Columbia Library Rare Books and Special Collections John Keenlyside Legal Research Collection
Print preview Hierarchy View:

617 results with digital objects Show results with digital objects

Wilson v. Curtis

File consists of six documents: declaration; affidavit of S. Mills; plaintiff's evidence in support of claim; affidavit of J. Wilson; bill of costs; judgment. Case regards goods and materials sold and delivered by the Plaintiff for the Defendant and cost of the suit totaling $630.10.

Wilson v. Pagden et al

File consists of 4 documents: Writ of Summons; Affidavit of Service; Judgement by Default; Plaintiff's Costs. The Plaintiff claims $103.33 principal and interest due to him as the holder of a promissory note with the Defendant.

Wilson v. Vaughan and Woods

File consists of six documents: judgment by default; (2) notices to appear; costs of judgment; writ of summons; affidavit of service of writ. Case regards the Plaintiff's clai of $88.40 principal and interest due to him as payee on a promissory note, total $114.

Wilson vs. Humphreys

Summons; Affidavit of Plaintiff; Costs; Examination of Humphreys; Order; Writ of Summons; Affidavit of Service; Judgement by Default.

-The plaintiff had recovered a judgment against the Defendant for $105.50 due on an unpaid promissory note and the costs of the suit. The said judgment remains unsatisfied.

Winjar v. Bonwick

File consists of 3 documents: Judgement by Default; Writ of Summons; Affidavit of Service. Plaintiff claims $378.24 principal due to him as payee on a promissory note from the Defendant.

Wise and mcDonough v. Powers et al

File consists of two documents: Summons; Affidavit of the Plaintiffs regarding the settlement of the estate of H. Hogan, deceased. The Plaintiffs are claiming the goods and chattels on the premises of "Hogans Soda Water Factory" amounting to $225.

Wolf v. Spears and Little

File consists of one document: Issues. The Plaintiff was owner of certain goods and chattels - 24,000 feet of assorted lumber, the sum of 90 pounds, and while so in possession, the said Defendant wrongfully and illegally possessed themselves of the said lumber and refuse to return it to the Plaintiffs

Wolf v. Spears and Little

File contains: Order to Sheriff; Pleas of Not Guilty and Not Possessed; Deposition of W. Gilbert; Deposition of S. Manson. The defendants are charged with taking and unjustly detaining 24,000 feet of assorted lumber from the Plaintiff.

Wolff v. Carey

File consists of 4 documents: Judgment by Default; Bill of Cost; Writ of Summons; Affidavit of Service. The Plaintiff claims $360.20 principal due to him as payee on an unpaid promissory note with the defendant.

Wood v. Costello

File consists of 5 documents: Writ of Habere facias possessionem; Affidavit of Service; Order to Seal Writ; Judgement; Judgement by Default. In regards to the possession of a parcel of land on Humboldt Street in Victoria. Wood is ordered as being fully entitled to the property. Costello was tenant on the property and seemed to be contesting ownership.

Wood v. Davidson

File contains: Affidavit of Wood and Culverwell; and an Order. The Defendant is indebted to the Plaintiff for $71.34 for privileged monies due to the Plaintiff on a judgment obtained against the said Defendant in the State of California. Plaintiff is concerned that the Defendant is about to quit the colony and asks that he be apprehended.

Woodcock v. Pickett and Pickett

File contains: Bill of Complaint; Affidavit of Plaintiff; Writ of Summons; Affidavit of G.H. Cary; Appearance of R. Pickett; Petition; (2) Order; Notice; Demurrer; Affidavit of G.E. Dennes; and (2) Order. The Plaintiff ordered through the Defendants acting as his agents, certain goods, cigars and liquors, which the Defendants agreed to procure for him. The Plaintiff paid them $7000 U.S. to be applied to the payment of the goods. The goods were delivered to the Defendants' store in Victoria but they wrongfully refused to deliver the balance of the said goods to the Plaintiff and they threatened to sell, dispose of and part with the same.

Woodcock v. Sehl et al

File consists of 7 documents: Interrogatories; (2) Affidavit of W. Pollard; Bill of Complaint; Affidavit of J. Hett; Answer of Defendant Sehl; Affidavit of J. Sehl. The Plaintiff is a trader and fish carver on the northwest coast of B.C. The Plaintiff and the Defendants had entered into an agreement for the purpose of prospecting and carrying on a general mining business in co-partnership. The partnership dissolved and the Plaintiff claims that the Defendant is indebted to the partnership for $500.

Wright v. Davis

Plea. The Defendant states that the freight payable by the Defendant and the stay safe money of the Defendant amounts to 57 pounds, 5 shillings, 10 pence which has been paid into court.

Young v. Bell

File consists of three documents: Affidavit of Service of Writ; Plaintiffs Bill of Costs; Judgment by Default. Plaintiff claims $100 principal due to him as payee on a promissory note

Young v. Hood

File consists of 2 documents: Order; Affidavit of M. Drake. Defendant is allegedly indebted to the Plaintiff for $2,433.11. The Defendant is desirous of having a new trial on the grounds of a mistake by the jury in which they found a verdict for the Plaintiff.

Young v. Hood

File consists of one document: Agreement in Pencil. Hood agreeing to take the goods of C.B. Young at the head of navigation on the Bella Coola route at the invoice price plus 25%.

Young v. Parker

File consists of 3 documents:
Affidavit of A. McKinnon; Affidavit of W. Culverwell; Affidavit of J. Parker. Parker had signed a promissory note for $1,500 with the Plaintiff, payable 90 days after the date when the note became due. He then signed a fresh note for the same amount, payable 60 days after the date due. Young is suing him for the amount due on the note and the Defendant believes that he has a good defense to the action.

Results 1901 to 1933 of 1933