显示 1152 结果

Archival description
Court Documents
打印预览 Hierarchy View:

359 有数字对象的结果 显示有数字对象的结果

Wilkes v. Webster

File consists of five documents: judgement by default; plaintiff's bill of costs; plaintiff's bill outlining debt; writ of service; affidavit of service. Case regards Plaintiff claiming $1,343.70 for debt owed to him by Defendant for balance of account due for goods bargained, sold and delivered.

Melum Coifra v. Metlakatla

File consists of one document: affidavit of W. Duncan, Justice of the Peace in Metlakatla. Case regards Melum Coifra, an Indigenous native at Fort Simpson, found guilty of threatening the life of one Kouda of Fort Simpson along with various other disputes involving the above named parties.

Clark v. Taylor

File consists of one document: court order. Case regards an order that the Plaintiff be at liberty to issue Writ of Capias endorsed to hold him to bail for $290.50.

Jacobs v. Oliver

File consists of one document: bill of complaint. Case regards the suite above the St. Nicholas Restaurant in the St. George Hotel on Government Street. Landlord is evicting tenant, even though he has been paying his rent and Defendant Oliver is holding that he is entitled to a one month's notice.

William Jones v. Joseph Mannion

File consists of one document: bill of complaint. Case regards the verbal partnership for the purpose of carrying on the business of Hotel and Saloon keepers at Granville, B.C.. Plaintiff unable to settle the accounts of the dissolved partnership, Defendant not cooperating.

Blakeney et al v. MacDonald et al

File consists of four documents: certificate of marriage between W. Blakeney and E. Reid; copy of the burial register for E. Blakeney; affidavit of W. Blakeney; defendant's bill of costs; plaintiff's bill of costs. Case regards W. Blakeney married E. Reid, who died without having made any disposition or appointment of the trust funds and property to which she became entitled to under the will of her father, J. Murray, deceased. Plaintiff is suing on behalf of E. Reid's children for the real estate entitled to her on Vancouver Island and the annual income of 120 pounds.

Puckett, an Infant v. John Quagliotti

File consists of four documents: affidavit of service, affidavit of W.R. Puckett; order for Habeus Corpus; affidavit of J. Quagliotti. Case regards W. Puckett had entrusted the care of the child to J. Quagliotti to board and keep the child as her mother had died. When the child was of seven or eight years old, Puckett claiming to re-take custody of the child.

Davies et al v. Patullo

File consists of one document: answers to interrogatories. Case regarding stock in the Leathers Patent Stone Association, Defendant to invest money in the above named company, broke his agreement which had been made without condition for $5,000 worth of stock.

Williams v. Foord

File consists of five documents: judgement of non-prosecution; defendant's cost on non-prosecution; defendant's bill of costs; affidavit of T.H. Williams; affidavit of C. Legatt. Case regarding Plaintiff Williams filed suit against the Defendant for libel reflection on his wife.

Sayward v. Reed Bros.

File consists of four documents: notice to plead; particulars of the plaintiff's demand; bill of costs; declaration. Case regards monies owed to Sayward Island Lumber and Spars for goods and services provided by Defendant to Plaintiff.

Wellington Mine v. William Hughes

File consists of three documents: affidavit of William Stewart; order; notice of time and place of hearing petition. Case regards in the matter of the Trustee Act 1850, Mineral Ordinance Amendment Act 1873, and of the petition of R. Dunsmuir, N. Diggle, and A. Farquar.

Stewart, Turnbull and Cranney v. Asle

File consists of one document: affidavit of H. Courtney. Case regards the affidavit outlining that all of the above named Plaintiffs are resident out of jurisdiction of the court. Plaintiff Stewart has been paid $2,000.00 plus interest as appears set out in the Bill of Complaint.

Dunlevy & Others v. Brousseau

File consists of seven documents: final judgment; (2) affidavit of Dunlevy and Wright; correspondence; affidavit of Brousseau; subpoena; appearance. Case regards the plaintiff suing for wrongful treatment, breach of contracts in regards to delivery, sale and use of goods in the amount of $5,000.

Riley v. Brown

File consists of five documents: order to pay, writ of summons, affidavit or service, plaintiff's bill of costs, judgement. Case regards Plaintiff claims $239.70 principal due plus interest on a primssory note for $357.74 made by the Defendant.

Coxan v. Elmore

File consists of three documents: Writ of Summons; Affidavit of Service; and Praecipe for Writ of Summons. Plaintiff claims $8,100 for debt and $50 for costs as the amount due on an unpaid promissory note.

Trahey v. St. Claire

File consists of two documents: writ of summons; and affidavit of A.E.B. Davie. Plaintiff claims $2,397.79 for debt and $7.50 for costs for the amount due for repairs of the vessel Byzantium as per agreement and for goods sold and delivered.

Joy v. Curnow, Curnow v. Joy

File consists of seven documents: affidavit to plead; affidavit of R. Bishop; affidavit of E. Johnson; plaintiff's bill of costs; praecipe for write of summons; appearance; order. The court finds for the Plaintiff in the amount of $4,200.

Wilson v. Vaughan and Woods

File consists of six documents: judgment by default; (2) notices to appear; costs of judgment; writ of summons; affidavit of service of writ. Case regards the Plaintiff's clai of $88.40 principal and interest due to him as payee on a promissory note, total $114.

Dussol v. The B.C. and Vancouver Island Spar Lumber and Saw Mill Co. Ltd.

File consists of ten documents: Order for the Examination of J. Ramsay; Examination of J. Ramsay; Commission; Notice of Demand of Special Jury to Sheriff; Affidavit of J.C . Davie; Affidavit of A.E.B. Davie; Evidence of C. Lawson; Examination of C. Lawson; Order for the Examination of C. Houston; and Commission for Examination of Witnesses out of the Jurisdiction of San Francisco.

Action is being brought to recover damages occasioned by the loss of the barge "Rosalia" from the alleged negligence in the towing of the named vessel.

E. Ord to J. Sanderson

File consists of two documents: bill of sale and affidavit of attesting witness wherein, in consideration of the sum of $700, E. Ord grants and assigns a cabin in Barkerville along with all of the household furnishings, chattels, and effects.

Richardson v. Gerow

File consists of six documents: request to withdraw judgement; certificate of R. Woods; judgement by default; writ of summons; affidavit of T. Davie. Case regards the failure on behalf of Defendant Gerow to appear in court, judgement made in favor of the Plaintiff to recover damages.

In the Matter of Laura Edmonds, Infant

File consists of five documents: affidavit of S. Tooley; affidavit of M. Edmonds; (2) court orders; notice to appear. Case regards that M. Edmonds acknowledges that her daughter Laura has been in the case of S. Tooley, but strongly objects to him taking her to San Francisco and demands that the child be returned to her. The Court orders that the child is to be returned to her mother.

Rodello v. Robb

File consists of eight documents: notice of filed bill of complaint; interrogatories for the examination of witnessess for the defendant; interrogatory replies; court order; writ of summons; summons for time to answer; praecipe for appearance; plaintiff joins issue with defendant. Case regards a dispute arising out of confusion over the terms of a land lease.

Hutchinson to Bent

File consists of one document: Chattel Mortgage wherein Hutchinson bargains, sells, and conveys his entire pack train consisting of 50 mules and their rigging for the sum of $1,330.

Dodgson v. Anderson

File consists of eleven documents: Commissions to A.H. Richardson, Esq.; Affidavit of A. Richards; Notice of Examination Under Commission; Plaintiff's Answers to Defendant's Interrogatories; Affidavit answering Interrogatories; Affidavit of Anderson and Bishop in Support of Order for Interrogatories; Affidavit of Dodgson; Affidavit of Anderson in Order for Discovery; Rule to Discontinue; Particulars of Demand; and Order.

Action is brought about by the Plaintiff to recover money owed to him be the Defendant and for a breach of contract between them regarding the purchase of cattle from Oregon. Plaintiff claims that he had settled his accounts with the Defendant which were recorded in a ledger of some sort and he asks that those records be admissible in his case. Judge rules that this action be discontinued.

Duck and Sandover v. Hamilton

File consists of two documents: Affidavit to Hold to Bail; and Order to Hold to Bail. Plaintiff claims $160 owed to him by the Defendant. The Defendant is about to leave the jurisdiction of the court and the Plaintiff asks that he be apprehended.

结果 301 到 350 的 1152