Showing 1933 results

Archival description
John Keenlyside Legal Research Collection
Print preview Hierarchy View:

617 results with digital objects Show results with digital objects

Young v. Parker

File consists of 3 documents:
Affidavit of A. McKinnon; Affidavit of W. Culverwell; Affidavit of J. Parker. Parker had signed a promissory note for $1,500 with the Plaintiff, payable 90 days after the date when the note became due. He then signed a fresh note for the same amount, payable 60 days after the date due. Young is suing him for the amount due on the note and the Defendant believes that he has a good defense to the action.

Young v. Hood

File consists of 2 documents: Order; Affidavit of M. Drake. Defendant is allegedly indebted to the Plaintiff for $2,433.11. The Defendant is desirous of having a new trial on the grounds of a mistake by the jury in which they found a verdict for the Plaintiff.

Young v. Hood

File consists of one document: Agreement in Pencil. Hood agreeing to take the goods of C.B. Young at the head of navigation on the Bella Coola route at the invoice price plus 25%.

Young v. Bell

File consists of three documents: Affidavit of Service of Writ; Plaintiffs Bill of Costs; Judgment by Default. Plaintiff claims $100 principal due to him as payee on a promissory note

Wright v. Davis

Plea. The Defendant states that the freight payable by the Defendant and the stay safe money of the Defendant amounts to 57 pounds, 5 shillings, 10 pence which has been paid into court.

Woodcock v. Sehl et al

File consists of 7 documents: Interrogatories; (2) Affidavit of W. Pollard; Bill of Complaint; Affidavit of J. Hett; Answer of Defendant Sehl; Affidavit of J. Sehl. The Plaintiff is a trader and fish carver on the northwest coast of B.C. The Plaintiff and the Defendants had entered into an agreement for the purpose of prospecting and carrying on a general mining business in co-partnership. The partnership dissolved and the Plaintiff claims that the Defendant is indebted to the partnership for $500.

Woodcock v. Pickett and Pickett

File contains: Bill of Complaint; Affidavit of Plaintiff; Writ of Summons; Affidavit of G.H. Cary; Appearance of R. Pickett; Petition; (2) Order; Notice; Demurrer; Affidavit of G.E. Dennes; and (2) Order. The Plaintiff ordered through the Defendants acting as his agents, certain goods, cigars and liquors, which the Defendants agreed to procure for him. The Plaintiff paid them $7000 U.S. to be applied to the payment of the goods. The goods were delivered to the Defendants' store in Victoria but they wrongfully refused to deliver the balance of the said goods to the Plaintiff and they threatened to sell, dispose of and part with the same.

Wood v. Davidson

File contains: Affidavit of Wood and Culverwell; and an Order. The Defendant is indebted to the Plaintiff for $71.34 for privileged monies due to the Plaintiff on a judgment obtained against the said Defendant in the State of California. Plaintiff is concerned that the Defendant is about to quit the colony and asks that he be apprehended.

Wood v. Costello

File consists of 5 documents: Writ of Habere facias possessionem; Affidavit of Service; Order to Seal Writ; Judgement; Judgement by Default. In regards to the possession of a parcel of land on Humboldt Street in Victoria. Wood is ordered as being fully entitled to the property. Costello was tenant on the property and seemed to be contesting ownership.

Wolff v. Carey

File consists of 4 documents: Judgment by Default; Bill of Cost; Writ of Summons; Affidavit of Service. The Plaintiff claims $360.20 principal due to him as payee on an unpaid promissory note with the defendant.

Wolf v. Spears and Little

File consists of one document: Issues. The Plaintiff was owner of certain goods and chattels - 24,000 feet of assorted lumber, the sum of 90 pounds, and while so in possession, the said Defendant wrongfully and illegally possessed themselves of the said lumber and refuse to return it to the Plaintiffs

Wolf v. Spears and Little

File contains: Order to Sheriff; Pleas of Not Guilty and Not Possessed; Deposition of W. Gilbert; Deposition of S. Manson. The defendants are charged with taking and unjustly detaining 24,000 feet of assorted lumber from the Plaintiff.

Wise and mcDonough v. Powers et al

File consists of two documents: Summons; Affidavit of the Plaintiffs regarding the settlement of the estate of H. Hogan, deceased. The Plaintiffs are claiming the goods and chattels on the premises of "Hogans Soda Water Factory" amounting to $225.

Winjar v. Bonwick

File consists of 3 documents: Judgement by Default; Writ of Summons; Affidavit of Service. Plaintiff claims $378.24 principal due to him as payee on a promissory note from the Defendant.

Wilson vs. Humphreys

Summons; Affidavit of Plaintiff; Costs; Examination of Humphreys; Order; Writ of Summons; Affidavit of Service; Judgement by Default.

-The plaintiff had recovered a judgment against the Defendant for $105.50 due on an unpaid promissory note and the costs of the suit. The said judgment remains unsatisfied.

Wilson v. Vaughan and Woods

File consists of six documents: judgment by default; (2) notices to appear; costs of judgment; writ of summons; affidavit of service of writ. Case regards the Plaintiff's clai of $88.40 principal and interest due to him as payee on a promissory note, total $114.

Wilson v. Pagden et al

File consists of 4 documents: Writ of Summons; Affidavit of Service; Judgement by Default; Plaintiff's Costs. The Plaintiff claims $103.33 principal and interest due to him as the holder of a promissory note with the Defendant.

Wilson v. Curtis

File consists of six documents: declaration; affidavit of S. Mills; plaintiff's evidence in support of claim; affidavit of J. Wilson; bill of costs; judgment. Case regards goods and materials sold and delivered by the Plaintiff for the Defendant and cost of the suit totaling $630.10.

Wilson v. Brown

File consists of four documents: Judgment by Default; Summons; Affidavit of Service; Plaintiffs Costs. Plaintiff claims $64 for debt, $17.50 for costs as principal due from the Plaintiff on an unpaid promissory note

Wilson and Murray v. Edgar

File consists of six documents: Affidavit of R.H. Wilson; Judgment by Default; Order; Order Nisi an Affidavit of S.S. Hubbard; Writ of Summons; and Affidavit of Service. Plaintiffs claims $91.30 principal and interest due to them as payee on a promissory note.

Wilson and Murragh v. Wilson

File consists of 4 documents: Affidavit of W.S. Green of Service of Notice to Decease; (2) Defendant's Bill of Costs; Judgement. - Plaintiffs had not declared in the action within the specific amount of time and the judge rules that the Defendant recover 3 pounds, 94 shillings for the costs of his defense.

Williams vs. Harrison

Promise to Pay; Writ of Summons; Copy of Judges notes; Exhibit "B" - Agreement; Affidavit of Service and Order; Affidavit of L.D. Williams; Bill of Costs.

-Plaintiff had recovered a judgment against the Defendant for $155.25 and costs on an unpaid promissory note for which he never received payment. the Defendant has since fled to the United States.

Williams v. Shustark

File contains: Affidavit of E. Wilson; (2) Affidavit of J. Copland; Affidavit of l Make; and Order. The Plaintiff had interfered with the Defendant in the erection of a fence around his lot on Douglas Street. The Defendant had not understood the description of or the parameters of his property and had unknowingly erected a portion of the fence on the Plaintiff's property.

Williams v. Foord

File consists of five documents: judgement of non-prosecution; defendant's cost on non-prosecution; defendant's bill of costs; affidavit of T.H. Williams; affidavit of C. Legatt. Case regarding Plaintiff Williams filed suit against the Defendant for libel reflection on his wife.

Williams v. Cohen et al

File consists of 9 documents: Order for Leave to Appear; (2) Writ of Summons; Affidavit of J.M. Roger; Affidavit of W. Hoffman; Affidavit of A. Hoffman; Affidavit of W.M. Drake: Writ of Summons; Affidavit of Service. The Plaintiff claims $1,156.24 principal interest due to him as payee on a promissory note. The Defendants are of the firm Cohen and Hoffman, Traders. Defendants Hoffman and Hoffman claim that the said Bill was not given in respect of any business or other transaction of the firm and therefore defend that they are not indebted to the Plaintiff for the said amount.

William Jones v. Joseph Mannion

File consists of one document: bill of complaint. Case regards the verbal partnership for the purpose of carrying on the business of Hotel and Saloon keepers at Granville, B.C.. Plaintiff unable to settle the accounts of the dissolved partnership, Defendant not cooperating.

Wilkie v. Vinter

File consists of three documents: writ of summons; affidavit of service; and judgment by default. Plaintiff claims $41.62 principal due to him as payee on a promissory note.

Wilkes v. Webster

File consists of five documents: judgement by default; plaintiff's bill of costs; plaintiff's bill outlining debt; writ of service; affidavit of service. Case regards Plaintiff claiming $1,343.70 for debt owed to him by Defendant for balance of account due for goods bargained, sold and delivered.

Wilcox v. Pemberton et al

File consists of four document: (2) Costs; Affidavit of J. Wilcox; Order. Plaintiff had erected and maintained a Hotel on Wharf Street in Victoria which did quite well, being in a location beside the harbour and near the bridge. However, the Defendants then constructed a bar across the bridge which "entirely intercepts and obstructs the transit and traffic of vehicle," they no longer travel in front of the Plaintiffs hotel and his business as Innkeeper has thereby been greatly injured as a result.

Wilcox v. Pemberton et al

File contains: Affidavit of G. Balls. Regarding the road from Esquimalt to Victoria, erected by the government for use by the public. The stoppage of the road by obstructing the bridge with a bar across the same thereby impending the traffic along the bridge has caused much injury to the property holders on Wharf Street.

Wilcox v. Munro

File consists of three documents: Original Award and Affidavit of Execution Thereof, Order; Submission. certain disputes and differences had arisen between the parties in respect of certain sums of money and the said parties had agreed to refer the same to arbitration to settle the dispute

Results 1 to 50 of 1933