Showing 1152 results

Archival description
Court Documents
Print preview Hierarchy View:

359 results with digital objects Show results with digital objects

Regina vs. Ah Ho

Indictment for Larceny from a dwelling house at granite Creek/

-Ah Ho is charged with breaking and entering the house of Bruneth and Sebanno and then stealing various possession of platinum and gold from them. Verdict, not guilty.

Mallandaime vs Ash

Summons; Affidavit of J. Ash

-Regarding the payment of a road tax of $63 levied on the Defendant. Ash was not satisfied with the said order telling him to pay the tax and intended to appeal it before the Supreme Court. There is some confusion over the amount of time that he had to enter his appeal.

Robson vs. Howard

Precept to Registrar to Set Cause Down for hearing; (3) Extract from the Record Precept Book of the Police Court, Victoria; Record.

The Defendant falsely and maliciously and without reasonable cause charged the Plaintiff with stealing a saw from him, value of $1.50. The Defendant also assaulted the Plaintiff, gave him into custody of a policeman and caused him to be imprisoned in a police office. The Plaintiff was injured in his reputation and was prevented from attending to his business as a result of the Defendant's actions and has also incurred expenses in obtaining his release from the said imprisonment. The Plaintiff claims $5,000 damages from the Defendant.

Regarding John Hamilton Gray

The Government Gazette. Victoria. July 15, 1871, p. 1-4.

-Regarding the intent of John Hamilton Gray of St. John, New Brunswick, Barrister at Law, to apply in the next ensuing term of the Supreme Court of British Columbia, to be admitted, enrolled and allowed to practice as a Barrister at Law in the Superior Courts of British Columbia.

In the Matter of T. Dessault, a supposed lunatic

Affidavit of E.A. Sharpe; Affidavit of E. Lynon; Affidavit C. Trew; Affidavit of H.S. Mason in Support of Petition; Petition.

-T. Dessault is of unsound mind and altogether unfit to govern himself or to manage his affairs. He has no relations in British Columbia and is currently detained in the lunatic asylum for safe keeping. Petitioner asks that the court certifies the lunacy of T. Dessault so that he may continued to be cared for in the asylum.

In the Matter of the Trustee Act 1850 and the Mineral Ordinance Amendment Act 1873 and of the Petiton of R. Dunsmuir, W.N. Diggle and A. Farquar

Petition.

-Dunsmuir, Diggle and farquar are the proprietors of the Wellington Coal Mine, Departure Bay, Nanaimo, and are desirous of acquiring a portion of certain lands near Departure Bay from W.J. Hughes for the purpose of communication with the sea shore. the two parties are having difficulty agreeing on a price for the property.

Rodello vs. Chantrell

Declaration with Particulars of Demand; Affidavit of Service of Notice of Declaration; Affidavit of B. Griffin; (2) Affidavit of J. Rodello.

-Plaintiff is suing over an overdue promissory note due to him by the Defendant for $136 plus interest.

Barnard vs Beedy

Affidavit of F.J. Barnard in support of Caprias; Praecipe for Writ of Attachment.

-Plaintiff claims that the Defendant is justly and truly indebted to him for $3,972.11, that being the amount certified due to him by the Registrar of the Supreme Court as the amount owed on unpaid accounts. The Defendant has not paid the Plaintiff the amount certified to be due and he has since left the province.

Needham vs Brown

Writ of Summons; Affidavit of Service; Judgment by Default; Affidavit of W. Drake; Plaintiff's Costs.

-The Plaintiff claims $830.76 for debt and $12.50 for costs for an amount of rent due in respect of Saanich Hall farm as well as interest on arrears of rent.

Murphy vs. Katz

Bond; (2) Writ of Summons; Correspondence on case; Affidavit of T. Davie; Affidavit of T.G. Murphy; Affidavit of Katz; Defendant's Costs of Suit; Issue; Judges order

The Plaintiff claims $250 for debt and $15 for costs for services performed by him as an Attorney at Law and Solicitor on behalf of the Defendant at Washington territory in the United States and for work done for the Defendant at his request.

Choak vs. Roberts

Judgment.

-Plaintiff is claiming money payable to him by the Defendant for money lent by the Plaintiff to the Defendant and for money paid by the Plaintiff for the Defendant at his request, and the Plaintiff claims $100. On the other hand, the Defendant claims that he is not indebted to the Plaintiff, but that the Plaintiff is indebted to him for an amount equal to the Plaintiff's claim plus interest.

In Regards to the Land Registry Act 1870 and Tax Sale Repeal Ordinance Amendment Act 1874

Affidavit of L. Lowenberg.

-Regarding the taxes due on Lots 656 and 657 in Victoria. Lowenberg states that he has paid the taxes due on the property. He has applied to the said Registrar General to cancel the charge against him for the taxes due and has produced the required receipts, but is having trouble clearing up the charge for various reasons.

Morton vs Drummond

Petition.

-Morton and Drummond had been candidates for election for the office of mayor holder in Victoria. Morton is charging that the list of voters used at the election for mayor was made out in a manner contrary to law and contained the names of many people who were not supposed to be on the voters list. The voters list was based on a Road Tax List, which had not been revised for the year 1874, and contained a great many names that had been put on it for the purpose of enabling them to vote. Morton charges that Drummond won the election as a result of these people that weren't supposed to be voting and asks that the election results be declared void and Drummond be removed from the position.

Johns vs. Major et al; Major et al vs. Johns

Affidavit of F.W. Pafford; Power of Attorney; Affidavit of Johns for Leave to Defend.

-L.Johns was an agent of J. Cunningham and carried on the business affairs of Cunningham as his attorney. Major and others claims $181.19 principal and interest due to them as payee on two promissory notes signed by Johns on behalf of Cunningham. Johns claims he never accepted the bills, and defends that this signature on the bills is merely to show that he endorsed the same with the name of James Cunningham.

Stromach vs. Prevost at al

Writ of Summons; Notice; Appeal from the County Court of British Columbia.

-The Defendants are charged with stealing the goods and chattels of the Plaintiff and disposing of them for their own use. The Plaintiff claims on account thereof $100.

Mason vs. Bate

(2) Affidavit of N. Shakespeare; (2) Affidavit of A.C. Elliot; Affidavit of M. bate; Affidavit of R. Plummer; Cross-examination of A.C. Elliot; Cross-Examination of R. Plummer; Affidavit of H.S. Mason; (2) Affidavit of R. Plummer; Affidavit of F.W. Egerton; Affidavit of H.F. Heisterman; Affidavit of W.G. Burroughs; Affidavit of W. Jackson; Summons for Time to Answer.

-Mason is the administrator of the estate of W. Rippon. the case deals with the overall settlement of the estate with the creditors and debtors and the various disputes that have arisen over the sale of a certain piece of property.

Cohen vs. the Phoenix Fire Assurance Company

(2) Notice; (3) Correspondences; (3) Affidavit of T.C. Nuttall; Costs; (3) Order; Affidavit of W.M. Ehner; Costs of Defendant; Summons; Affidavit of W. Wilson; Bill of Costs; Bills of Costs taxed under reference.

-Cohen had a fire at this business for which he was insured and covered by the Phoenix Fire Assurance Company. The two aprties appear to be disputing over their costs and extent of coverage.

McWha vs. Baker

Summons; Judgment; Bill of Costs; Summons; Affidavit of A. McWha.

-Plaintiff had acquired a previous Order against the Defendant for $169.68 for which he never received any payment. The Defendant has made an application stating that he has satisfied the Plaintiff's demand which the Plaintiff claims is wholly untrue.

Stewart and Braden vs. Kelly and Taylor

Evidence of John Stewart.

-Stewart and Braden were a plumbing firm involved in the labor of St. Joseph's Hospital. Kelly and Taylor had done some work for the firm but there was dispute over their account and the hours that they were claiming and the Plaintiff's record of their hours.

Bennett vs. Adams

Bill of Complaint; Affidavit of Adams; Affidavit of Bennett; Bill of Costs.

-The Plaintiff is a bridge builder, the Defendant is a carpenter and joiner. The Defendant was contracted with the government of B.C. to build a bridge across the Quesnel River and asked the Plaintiff, who agreed, to work with him for a share in the profits and a partnership agreement. The Plaintiff ended up doing all of the work. The Defendant was paid in full, but would not disclose his accounts of the costs of construction. The Plaintiff believes that if her were to see these accounts, a considerable balance would be owed to him by the Defendant.

Williams vs. Harrison

Promise to Pay; Writ of Summons; Copy of Judges notes; Exhibit "B" - Agreement; Affidavit of Service and Order; Affidavit of L.D. Williams; Bill of Costs.

-Plaintiff had recovered a judgment against the Defendant for $155.25 and costs on an unpaid promissory note for which he never received payment. the Defendant has since fled to the United States.

Wilson vs. Humphreys

Summons; Affidavit of Plaintiff; Costs; Examination of Humphreys; Order; Writ of Summons; Affidavit of Service; Judgement by Default.

-The plaintiff had recovered a judgment against the Defendant for $105.50 due on an unpaid promissory note and the costs of the suit. The said judgment remains unsatisfied.

British Columbia Line: Fences and Water Court Act 1876 - South Saanich

(2) Decision of Fence Viewers.

-Viewers have been nominated to view and arbitrate on the "water courses" on the lands of Mr. R. Brown and in which water courses the under-mentioned parties are more or less benefited by R. Brown, J. Sluggett, S. Alphonse, G. Butler and the Bank of British Columbia, between the lands of which parties the water the courses are to be made and maintained.

Bell vs. Holbrook

Receipt for $346 - Exhibit "G"; Evidence of H.V. Edmonds.

-Receipt of money from H. Holbrook for which was realized by sale of lots for payment of municipal taxes. Evidence is also regarding the taxes owed and assessed.

Regarding Dietz

Affidavit of E. Johnson.

-E Johnson is the attorney for G.Dietz. Mr. George askew has applied to E. Johnson for a loan of $3500 upon a mortgage. Johnson believes that the proposed loan, to be advanced out of the moneys of G. Dietz, would be a safe and advantageous investment for him.

The British Columbia Investors Loan Society vs. Baynes Sound Colliery Company Ltd.

Bill of Costs; Replication; Affidavit of S.P. Mills; Amended Account; Affidavit of Mr. Thomson; Summons; Affidavit of C.W.R. Thomson; Appointment of Mssrs. Crake and Jackson; Affidavit of R.E. Jackson; Bill of Complaint; Chief Clerk Notes.

-Defendants are indebted to the Plaintiffs for $18,560 for principal and interest due on an account between them for the conveyance of land in the District of nelson, Vancouver Island (1,064 acres). The Defendants are in possession of the said premises but have not paid their debt.

Strouss vs. Oppenheimer at al.

Affidavit of C. Strouss; Petition of Plaintiff; Bill of Complaint.

-Defendants are indebted to the Plaintiff for $5,799.62 principal and interest due on unpaid goods and merchandise advanced to the Defendants at their request.

Mackenzie vs. The Corporation of Victoria

Summons; Exhibit "A"; Authority to Receive Money out of Court; Notice Record.

-The corporation's water works department laid water pipes on the Plaintiff's lands which then flooded his lands and permeated them with water, greatly depreciating his property value. The case was taken to arbitration and the Plaintiff was awarded $475 for damages or at the Defendant's expense, the draining and repairing of his property. The Defendants have not responded to the satisfaction of the Plaintiff. The Plaintiff claims $1,500 for damages.

Johnson vs. Mayereau and Causasa

Affidavit of T. Davie; (2) Summons; Affidavit of H. Homewood; Bond; Notice; Statement of Claim

-Plaintiff claims $500 for damages; that the Defendant seized and took the Plaintiff's good, household furniture, pictures, kitchen utensils, shotgun, etc. and carried them away and disposed of them for their own use.

Roberts vs. Woodcock

Affidavit of J. Roberts; Bail piece; Writ of Summons.

-Plaintiff claims $360 for debt and $17.50 for costs for work and labour done by the Plaintiff for the Defendant as the hired servant of the Defendant.

Stewart and Co. v. Ash

File consists of three documents: an affidavit of J.R. Stewart and correspondence regarding the purchase of the cargo of the ship "Shamrock," wherein the Defendant does not own up to the contract.

Matheson v. Stewart Meldrum and Company

File consists of one document: an affidavit of J.R. Stewart regarding action brought about by the Plaintiff for the recovery of $1,890.71 in salary allegedly due to him by the Defendant. Defendant claims that the case cannot proceed without his necessary witness (Meldrum), who is currently residing in Scotland outside the jurisdiction of the court.

Results 101 to 150 of 1152