显示 1933 结果

Archival description
John Keenlyside Legal Research Collection
打印预览 Hierarchy View:

617 有数字对象的结果 显示有数字对象的结果

Burnaby v. Solomon

File consists of six documents: Defendant's Bill of Costs; Record; Jury List; Affidavit of W. Green; Incipitor of Judgment; and Plaintiff's Bill of Costs. The Defendant has taken the goods of the Plaintiff from him: 4 tierces of rum; 2 bales containing 50 pairs of
4 point blankets, etc. The Plaintiff claims a return of the goods or their value of $1,250.

Hawley v. Baronovich

File consists of two documents: Return of Commission; and Defendant's Bill of Costs. Examination of witnesses on behalf of the Plaintiff, Nakloab and Alyah, regarding a man named "Charley," who sold whiskey to Indigenous Peoples in exchange for minks.

Mayer v. Butler and Nightingale

File consists of two documents: Order; and Affidavit to Hold to Bail. Defendants indebted to the Plaintiff for $104 for goods sold and delivered. Defendants about to leave the colony of Vancouver Island and Plaintiff is asking that they be apprehended.

Braden v. Kelly and Taylor

File consists of one document: Affidavit of Braden wherein action is brought for the recovery of money payable for work and labor performed by the Plaintiff for the Defendants and for materials provided in and about the same.

Rasmusen alias Jackson v. Wright

File consists of five documents: Affidavits of Rasmusen; Order; Evidence of Sparks;and Evidence of Rallet. Action is brought to recover the sum of $500 as damages for the alleged wrongful acts of the Defendant towards the Plaintiff. Proceedings being delayed by material witness Sparks who is about to leave the jurisdiction of the court.

McAlister to J. Greer

File consists of two documents: Affidavit of A. Meacham and Mortgage wherein, in consideration of the sum of $500, McAlister grants to Greer four horses and covered wagons and all tools and implements.

Trounce v. Strachan and Ogilvy

File consists of nineteen documents: Record; Rule nisi; Examination of J. Dunstan; Affidavit of H.C. Courtney; Affidavits of R. Bishop; Affidavits of G. Hemingway; Commission for Examination of J. Dunstan; Summons; Affidavit of Service; Affidavit of A.E.B. Davie; Affidavits of Increase; Joint Affidavit of G. Pearkes and G. Hemingway; Affidavit of G. Pearkes; and Plaintiff's Bill of Costs.

Defendants agreed to sell to the Plaintiff two cargoes of rubble and dimension sandstone from Salt Spring Island. Defendants delivered the first cargo and part of the second. The Plaintiff was employed and under contract to build a chiveck at New Westminster for the erection of which he required the cargo. Plaintiff had to lay off his workmen and has been deprived of profits which would have accrued to him from the delivery of the said stone. Plaintiff claims $2,000 for losses.

Pidcock v. Duncan

File consists of two documents: Envelope; and Correspondence between Pidcock and the court. Duncan has been committed to prison for one week for contempt of court and failure to obey a summons.

Murray v. Campbell

File consists of two documents: affidavit of W. Muuray; and order. Defendant is indebted to the Plaintiff for $109 for goods sold and delivered. The Plaintiff is concerned that the Defendant is about to leave the colony and asks that he be apprehended.

Dussol v. The B.C. and Vancouver Island Spar Lumber and Saw Mill Co. Ltd.

File consists of ten documents: Order for the Examination of J. Ramsay; Examination of J. Ramsay; Commission; Notice of Demand of Special Jury to Sheriff; Affidavit of J.C . Davie; Affidavit of A.E.B. Davie; Evidence of C. Lawson; Examination of C. Lawson; Order for the Examination of C. Houston; and Commission for Examination of Witnesses out of the Jurisdiction of San Francisco.

Action is being brought to recover damages occasioned by the loss of the barge "Rosalia" from the alleged negligence in the towing of the named vessel.

Clark v. Taylor

File consists of one document: court order. Case regards an order that the Plaintiff be at liberty to issue Writ of Capias endorsed to hold him to bail for $290.50.

Jacobs v. Oliver

File consists of one document: bill of complaint. Case regards the suite above the St. Nicholas Restaurant in the St. George Hotel on Government Street. Landlord is evicting tenant, even though he has been paying his rent and Defendant Oliver is holding that he is entitled to a one month's notice.

William Jones v. Joseph Mannion

File consists of one document: bill of complaint. Case regards the verbal partnership for the purpose of carrying on the business of Hotel and Saloon keepers at Granville, B.C.. Plaintiff unable to settle the accounts of the dissolved partnership, Defendant not cooperating.

Blakeney et al v. MacDonald et al

File consists of four documents: certificate of marriage between W. Blakeney and E. Reid; copy of the burial register for E. Blakeney; affidavit of W. Blakeney; defendant's bill of costs; plaintiff's bill of costs. Case regards W. Blakeney married E. Reid, who died without having made any disposition or appointment of the trust funds and property to which she became entitled to under the will of her father, J. Murray, deceased. Plaintiff is suing on behalf of E. Reid's children for the real estate entitled to her on Vancouver Island and the annual income of 120 pounds.

Puckett, an Infant v. John Quagliotti

File consists of four documents: affidavit of service, affidavit of W.R. Puckett; order for Habeus Corpus; affidavit of J. Quagliotti. Case regards W. Puckett had entrusted the care of the child to J. Quagliotti to board and keep the child as her mother had died. When the child was of seven or eight years old, Puckett claiming to re-take custody of the child.

Davies et al v. Patullo

File consists of one document: answers to interrogatories. Case regarding stock in the Leathers Patent Stone Association, Defendant to invest money in the above named company, broke his agreement which had been made without condition for $5,000 worth of stock.

Williams v. Foord

File consists of five documents: judgement of non-prosecution; defendant's cost on non-prosecution; defendant's bill of costs; affidavit of T.H. Williams; affidavit of C. Legatt. Case regarding Plaintiff Williams filed suit against the Defendant for libel reflection on his wife.

Sayward v. Reed Bros.

File consists of four documents: notice to plead; particulars of the plaintiff's demand; bill of costs; declaration. Case regards monies owed to Sayward Island Lumber and Spars for goods and services provided by Defendant to Plaintiff.

Rawling v. Eickhoff

File consists of four documents: petition to appoint; affidavit of R. Rawling; affidavit of R. Hett; record. Case regards Plaintiff charing $1,000 for damages for slander in that the Defendant falsely and maliciously spoke and published words stating that the Plaintiff had stoled a pair of trousers from the Defendant. See 18-57 for more.

Bell v. Holbrook

File consists of ten documents: affidavit of H.M. Bell; replication; (2) summons; affidavit of W. Polland; affidavit of A.E. Davie; supplemental answers; answers to interrogatories; affidavit of Holbrook; affidavit of H.F. Heisterman.

The Eureka Silver Mining Company and the Victorian Mining Company v. Mr. Teague

File consists of one document: bill of complaint. Teague, a collector, advertising the sale of the mining companies' properties due to unpaid taxes of $1,553.75 (Eureka) and $931.25 (Victoria), alleging that the lands are liable to the tax imposed by the Mineral Act of 1878. Plaintiffs allege that the real state is not held under the Act or any other gold mining act. They order to restrain Teague for selling their property and to pay the costs of the suit.

McNeil v. McNeil

File consists of seven documents: summons to proceed; affidavit of R. Cridge and T. Alsop; affidavit of J.R. Hett; affidavit of E. Johnson; affidavit of G. Blenkinsop; order for resurvey and partition; decree. Case regards a dispute arising out of the last will and testament of Mr. McNeil involving guardianship of infant children and division of property.

Towns et al v. Enterprise Corporation

File consists of one document: bill of complaint. Case regarding Plaintiff's were shareholders in Enterprise Corp., a mining company, and have various complaints that the calls made by the Directors for monies were not levied equally on all shareholders; the books of the company were being kept in a most irregular manner; and not general meetings were called.

In the Matter of the Land Registry Act 1870 v. Exparte L. Malatesta

File consists of five documents: petition; order; registration of charge against Malatesta; notice that no charge appears registered; affidavit of Malatesta. Care regards Malatesta, owner of lot 912, Victoria, does not hold the original title, the dispute is arising over the ownership of the peoperty and is settled in Malatesta's favor.

In the Matter of the Estate of A.S. Bates, deceased [3]

File consists of seven documents: notice/advertisement regarding the sale of Bates real estate; correspondence to C.E. Pooley regarding the purchase of property; affidavit of Isabel S. Mansfield; correspondence from lawyers in San Francisco regarding the estate; affidavit of C.E. Pooley; affidavit of L. Fisk; legal documents regarding the estate of Isabel S. Bates. Case regards the settlement of the estate and effects of A.S. Bates. See 19-10, 19-19, and 19-29 for more.

The Estate of A.S. Bates, deceased

File consists of three documents: order; annexed statements of account marked A, B, C, D, and E; report. Case is in regards to the settlement of the estate of A.S. Bates, deceased, statements showing the full amount of all monies received and disbursed by C.E. Pooley, administrator. See 19-10, 19-19, and 19-20 for more.

Haskell v. Hart and Sharron

File consists of two documents: Affidavit of W. Sharron; Notice regarding the arrival of a brick making machine on the ship "Frigate Bird" purchased by the Plaintiff, now in the possession and under the control of the Defendant. Plaintiffs counsel is interfering in other matters of the said Defendants, of which he has no authority or right to interfere with, other than the brick making machine

Steinberger v Monaghan et al

File consists of nine documents: Withdrawal of Suit; Order for Writ of Injunction; (2) Affidavit of Steinberger; Order, (2) Affidavit of Monaghan; Notice of Motion; Bill of Complaint. Defendant is indebted to the Plaintiff for 272 pounds sterling for a lot purchased that the Plaintiff purchased from him in Victoria. Upon purchasing the lot, the Plaintiff hired Monaghan to remove the brewing utensils belonging to the Plaintiffs company, "Victoria Brewery" from the other Defendants' location where he was previously a tenant, and move them to his newly purchased lot. However, when the Plaintiff applied for the conveyance of the lot, the Defendant could not produce such because he had actually executed it to the other Defendant. The two Defendants were in collaboration to prevent and injure the business of the Plaintiff and to prevent the erection of a brewery on the said lot.

结果 1351 到 1400 的 1933