Showing 987 results

Archival description
John Keenlyside Legal Research Collection File
Print preview Hierarchy View:

R. v. Jim & Nequalia (21 doc); Charged with murder; 1866/01/00

Indictment of Jim, an Indian & Nequalia, an Indian woman; the murder of Edmund Urin;
verdict not guilty; 1866/01/01
Commitment of Jim for murder; signed by A. Pemberton; 1866/01/02
Commitment of Nequalia for accessory to murder; signed by A. Pemberton; 1866/01/03
Recognisance of bail to witnesses; 1866/01/04
Deposition of Patrick Ferrall; 1866/01/05
Information & complaint of Patrick Ferrall; 1866/01/06
Deposition of Tom; a New Westminster Indian; 1866/01/07
Deposition of Allen Francis; 1866/01/08
Deposition of Dr. J.C. Davie; 1866/01/09
Deposition of A. Browning; 1866/01/10
Deposition of J. Wooster; 1866/01/11
Deposition of T. O‟Connor; 1866/01/12
Deposition of Stemloh; a New Westminster Indian; 1866/01/13
Deposition of J. McCarthy; 1866/01/14
Deposition of Peter; a New Westminster Indian; 1866/01/15
Deposition of Sapple Jack; a New Westminster Indian; 1866/01/16
Deposition of Jim, alias Quay-much-than; a Songhish Indian; 1866/01/17
Deposition of Jim; the accused; 1866/01/18
Affidavit of A. Pemberton; stipendiary magistrate, Victoria; 1866/01/19
Deposition of Tim, recalled; 1866/01/20
Information & complaint; of Patrick Ferrall; 1866/01/21

R. v. Harry, an Indian (9doc); Charged with shooting with intent; 1871/09/00

Indictment of Harry; plea guilty; sentence 1 year; 1871/09/01
Charge; by Wm Morley, J.P., Cowichan; 1871/09/02
Recognisance of bail (2); 1871/09/03
Information & complaint; of Sur-sar-kalur, a Chemainus Indian; 1871/09/04
Examination; of Sur-sar-kalur; 1871/09/04
Examination of Se-hap-ton; 1871/09/05
Deposition of Harry; the accused; 1871/09/06

R. v. Billy (9 docs); Charge of murder; 1871/08/00

Commitment of Billy; for killing Mary, a Yale Indian woman; 1871/08/01
Charge to Billy; 1871/08/02
Commitment of DrMcInnes; to appear at trial; 1871/08/03
Deposition of Doctor; a Yale Indian; 1871/08/04
Deposition of MaryMurphy; 1871/08/05
Deposition of George; a Yale Indian; 1871/08/06
Deposition of Dr. McInnes; re post mortem; 1871/08/07
Deposition of EdwardCoffee; 1871/08/08
Indictment of Billy; 1871/08/09

R. v. Ah Yen & Ah Toy (7); Charged with breaking into and stealing from a shop; 1872/02/00

Indictment, Ah Yen,Ah Toy; verdict guilty; sentence 3 years; Victoria; 1872/02/01
Information & complaint; of Wm. Bowden; 1872/02/02
Deposition of John Ward; 1872/02/03
Deposition of Wm. Bowden; with m/s drawing of site of incident; 1872/02/04
Deposition of John Turner; 1872/02/05
Deposition of David Rappitt; 1872/02/06
Depsoition of Ah Toe; 1872/02/06

R. v. Ah Yan; Charged with rape (14 docs); 1866/15/00

Information & complaint; of Rosalie Gonieau re rape of 5 yr old daughter Mary;
1866/15/01
Recognisance of bail; 1866/15/02
Deposition of Mary; all depositions witnessed by A. Pemberton; 1866/15/03
Deposition of Charley; 1866/15/04
Deposition of M. Gonieau; 1866/15/05
Deposition of J. McCarthy; 1866/15/06
Deposition of Dr J Davie Sr.; 1866/15/07
Deposition of Dr J Davie Jr.; 1866/15/08

R. v. Ah Sam (15 docs); Charged with stabbing with intent; 1871/03/00

Indictment of Ah Sam for stabbing with intent; verdict guilty; sentence $200 fine; 1871/03/01
of witnesses; 1871/03/02
Affidavit of A.Pemberton; re evidence of R. McMillan; 1871/03/03
Information & complaint of R. McMillan, 1871/03/04
Deposition of Ah Sam; all depositions witnessed by A. Pemberton; 1871/03/05
Deposition of Ah Hoon; 1871/03/06
Deposition of H. Courtenay; with m/s drawing of scene of crime; 1871/03/07
Deposition of Hing Yoon; 1871/03/07
Deposition of Shu Haw; 1871/03/08
Deposition of Wah; 1871/03/09
Deposition of San Quay; 1871/03/10
Deposition of Ah Soo; 1871/03/11
Deposition of Kum Shin; 1871/03/12
Deposition of Ah Moon; 1871/03/13
Deposition of Ah Sam; 1871/03/14

R. v. Ah Bow ( 5 docs); Charged with breaking & entering & theft; 1875/05/00

Commitment of Ah Bow; to trial at New Westminster assize; 1875/05/01
Recognisances; to prosecute and give evidence; 1875/05/02
Deposition of Ellard; re theft of meerschaum pipes and knives; 1875/05/03
Deposition of Jackson; 1875/05/04
Statement of Ah Bow; all statements witnessed by Arthur Bushby, James Douglas‟ sonin-
law; 1875/05/05

Putnam v. Cumming

File contains: Affidavit of M.W. Drake; Order of Court for Writ of Injunction. Both the Plaintiff and the Defendant are out of the jurisdiction of the court and the statements outlined in the Bill of Complaint have not been verified by any Affidavit of the Plaintiff, nor does it state in the said bill that the Defendant is liable for any debt.

Putnam v. Cumming

File consists of 5 documents: Bill of Costs; Notice of Motion; (2) Bill of Complaint; Subpoena. Plaintiff was captain of the "Red River" and expended as Master of the said ship large sums of money for necessary disbursements and expenses for the ship to operate on a voyage from Hong Kong to Victoria. The Plaintiff claims a balance on that account and for wages owed to him as Captain, the sum of 187 pounds, 12 shillings. The ship is now under the command of the Defendant.

Puckett, an Infant v. John Quagliotti

File consists of four documents: affidavit of service, affidavit of W.R. Puckett; order for Habeus Corpus; affidavit of J. Quagliotti. Case regards W. Puckett had entrusted the care of the child to J. Quagliotti to board and keep the child as her mother had died. When the child was of seven or eight years old, Puckett claiming to re-take custody of the child.

Pryce v. Waddington

File consists of 3 documents: Record; List of Names; Plaintiff's Bill of Costs. Pryce is suing the Defendant for 107 pounds, 12 shillings, and 6 pence for work done by the Plaintiff for the Defendant at his request and for money founds to be due from the Defendant to the Plaintiff on accounts stated between them.

Promis v. Elford

File consists of four documents: Writ of Summons; Affidavit of Service; Bill of Costs by Default of Appearance; Judgment by Default. Plaintiff claims $100 principal due to him as payee on a promissory note

Price v. Fletcher et al

File consists of 2 documents: Judgement; Costs of Judgement of Non-Prosecution. The Plaintiff was a saloonkeeper in Dennis Creek, Cassiar, and he claims that the Defendants converted to their own use and wrongfully deprived the Plaintiff of the Plaintiff's goods, a tent-house where he ran his business out of. The Plaintiff is claiming $5,000.

Price and Green v. Woodcock

File consists of three documents: Writ of Summons; Affidavit of Thaim; Writ of Caprias. The Plaintiffs complain that the Defendant is indebted to them for the sum of 94 pounds, 16 shillings for goods sold and delivered.

Price and Green v. Nuttall

File consists of 1 document: Writ of Summons (Statement of Account attached). The Plaintiffs complain that the Defendant is indebted to them for 122 pounds, 17 shillings, and 7 pence for goods sold and delivered by the Plaintiffs to the Defendant at his request and also for money due from the Defendant to the Plaintiffs on an account stated between them (particulars listed in the attached Statement of Account).

Price and Green v. Jacobs

File contains: Envelope; Summons; Notice of Motion; Affidavit of N.M. Sticks; and an Order. The Defendant is indebted to the Plaintiff for 70 pounds, 5 shillings and 2 pence for 2256 sacks of flour sold to the Defendant by the Plaintiff at his request. There is concern that the Defendant is about to quit the colony unless he is apprehended.

Preston v. Allen

File consists of two documents: Affidavit of W. Culverwell; Order. Plaintiff at liberty to hold the Defendant to bail for 24 pounds, 12 shillings principal money due on a promissory note. The Defendant is about to quit Vancouver Island unless his is apprehended.

Pratt v. Frain

File consists of 4 documents: Bill of Costs; Writ of Summons; Affidavit of Service; Judgement. The Plaintiff claims $171 for debt and $17 for costs as the amount due on a promissory note with the Defendant.

Pidwell v. Cox & Co.

File consists of 3 documents: Summary Suit-Writ of Summons; Statement of F. Volkman; Correspondence between Cox and Colquan. Plaintiff is suing for the balance due in respect of wages on the "Pemberton Wagon Road", approximately $101.00.

Results 351 to 400 of 987