Showing 1933 results

Archival description
University of British Columbia Library Rare Books and Special Collections John Keenlyside Legal Research Collection
Print preview Hierarchy View:

617 results with digital objects Show results with digital objects

Magee v. Hall

File consists of two documents: Bill of Complaint; Bill of Costs, "A". Plaintiff asks that an account be taken of all monies received by the Defendant on behalf of the Plaintiff or his wife. There seems to be confusion between both the Plaint and his wife and the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff and the Defendant on monies owed or previously received.

Mallandaime vs Ash

Summons; Affidavit of J. Ash

-Regarding the payment of a road tax of $63 levied on the Defendant. Ash was not satisfied with the said order telling him to pay the tax and intended to appeal it before the Supreme Court. There is some confusion over the amount of time that he had to enter his appeal.

Malowanski v. Franklyn

File consists of ten documents: writ of summons; affidavit of service; judgment by default; order to hold bail; affidavit of Soloman; affidavit of Clayton; writ; correspondence; affidavit of J. Franklyn; and bill of costs. Case regards the Defendant being indebted to the Plaintiffs for the sum of $746.30 for goods sold and delivered as well as the Defendant leaving the country for the purpose of defrauding his creditors.

Marks and Winkler v. Moore and Moore

File consists of two documents: affidavit of S. Marks; and order to hold to bail. Case regards Defendants being indebted to the Plaintiffs for $600 for goods sold and delivered. Defendants are about to leave Esquimalt for California and Plantiff asks that they be apprehended.

Marks v. Rammage

File consists of two documents: affidavit of E. Marks; and order to hold to bail. The Defendant is indebted to the Plaintiff for $140 being the balance of an account rendered for goods sold and delivered. The Defendant is about to leave to San Francisco and the Plaintiff asks that he be apprehended.

Marshall v. Astrico, deceased

File consists of two documents: Petition to Dismiss Bill; Bill of Complaint. at the time of his death, the Defendant was indebted to the Plaintiff for $482.00 on unpaid promissory notes and various other debts and unsettled accounts between the two parties

Martin v. Josephs (3); Victoria; 1861.63

No. of Plaint – 725

Summons; Invoice for £6.5; Judgment Confessed - Josephs is summoned to appear in court to answer the Plaintiff for the total amount of
£6.14.4. The amount is due for ten weeks lodging, a leather pillow, a cash loan, one gray shirt, and some soap and a purse, provided by the Plaintiff to the Defendant.

Marvin and Wright to Brown and Adair

File consists of 2 documents: Affidavit of H.P. Walker for Execution of Registration under the Bill of Sale Act; Copy of Bill of Sale. Marvin and Wright advanced $3,000 to Brown and Adair for the purchase of a stern wheel steam vessel the "Victoria", built by Marvin and Wright.

Marvin v. Chittendam et al

File contains: Judgment by Default of Appearance; Affidavit of Service and Copy of Writ; Bill of Costs; Affidavit of E. Marvin; and Order.The Plaintiff claims $480.28 as principal and interest due to him as payee on a promissory note and the Plaintiff is concerned that the Defendants are about to quit the colony.

Marvin v. Colker and Snow

File consists of two documents: an order to hold bail and an affidavit of debt, both in regard to the Plaintiff's liberty to hold Defendants to bail for $1,242.66, the amount of an unpaid account with Merchant Marvin for goods sold and delivered.

Marvin v. Elford

File consists of three documents: writ of summons; affidavit of service; and judgment by default. Case regards the Plaintiff's claim of $42 from the Defendant for an unpaid promissory note plus $12.50 for costs and interest.

Marvin v. Murray

File consists of two documents: order to hold to bail; and affidavit to hold to bail. Defendant is indebted to Plaintiff for $198.87 for principal money and interest due to him as endorsee of a promissory note.

Marvin v. Redfield

File consists of two documents: affidavit to hold to bail; and order to hold to bail. Case regards Defendant being indebted to the Plaintiff for $475.15 for accounts between them and for the balance of dividends received from the Chittenden Mining Claim on Lowkee Creek. The Defendant is planning to leave Vancouver Island for San Francisco and the Plaintiff is asking that he be apprehended.

Marvin v. Stuart

File consists of six documents: plaintiff's bill of costs; affidavit of C. Pooley; bill for service of writ; judgment by default; summons; affidavit of service. Case regards the Plaintiff's claim of $230.00 principal and interest due as holder of a promissary note.

Marvin v. Whitford

File consists of eleven documents: Receipt from Whitford to Marvin; correspondence between Whitford and Marvin; correspondence between Marvin and Geller; and Commission for Examination of G. Kastronniteroff and H. Wylot. Marvin seems to have made arrangements for Whitford to open up a business for him in Alaska. There are some unpaid debts and confusions between the Defendant and the Plaintiff regarding money lent to begin the business.

Mason v. Bate

File consists of 4 documents: Affidavit of H.F. Heisterman; Affidavit of R. Plummer (with attached Exhibits A & B). Mason is the administrator of the estate of W. Rippon. Rippon was the owner of a piece of property, Section 20, Range IV, Mountain District, Vancouver Island. Upon his death, the property was to be sold at public action, authorized by Mason. Noah Shakespeare, acting as the agent of Mr. Bate and the Vancouver Coal Company, purchased the said property on their behalf. Bate then stated that Shakespeare has exceeded his instruction. It is presumed that Mason is suing for the purchase price of the property, 100 acres at $250 an acre, equaling $25,000.

Mason vs. Bate

(2) Affidavit of N. Shakespeare; (2) Affidavit of A.C. Elliot; Affidavit of M. bate; Affidavit of R. Plummer; Cross-examination of A.C. Elliot; Cross-Examination of R. Plummer; Affidavit of H.S. Mason; (2) Affidavit of R. Plummer; Affidavit of F.W. Egerton; Affidavit of H.F. Heisterman; Affidavit of W.G. Burroughs; Affidavit of W. Jackson; Summons for Time to Answer.

-Mason is the administrator of the estate of W. Rippon. the case deals with the overall settlement of the estate with the creditors and debtors and the various disputes that have arisen over the sale of a certain piece of property.

Matheson v. Stewart Meldrum and Co.

File consists of eighteen documents: affidavit of Bishop and Matheson; particulars of set off; bill of costs; summons; affidavit of Matheson to obtain order to examine witness; affidavit of E. Dennes; affidavit of Matheson and Watson; affidavit of A. Stenhouse; evidence of A. Stenhouse; affidavits of Matheson and Stenhouse; evidence of A. Stenhouse; joint affidavit between Green and Prevort; affidavits of Matheson; record; and affidavit of J. Colquhoun.

Plaintiff had originally hired E. Dennes as his attorney in his case but was dissatisfied with the lack of progress and action being taken. The action is brought about for recovery of $1,891 for salary due to the Plaintiff and for work and labor done and for money expended by him for the Defendants at their request. Defendant Meldrum has left Victoria, thus further delaying the case.

Matheson v. Stewart Meldrum and Company

File consists of one document: an affidavit of J.R. Stewart regarding action brought about by the Plaintiff for the recovery of $1,890.71 in salary allegedly due to him by the Defendant. Defendant claims that the case cannot proceed without his necessary witness (Meldrum), who is currently residing in Scotland outside the jurisdiction of the court.

Mayer et al. v. Brunn

File consists of seven documents: Judgment by Default of Plea; Judgment; Affidavit of Jackson; Affidavit of G. Hemingway; Writ; Declaration; and Bill of Costs. Plaintiffs are suing for money owed to them by the Defendant for goods sold and delivered and for work done and materials provided in the amount of $1,000.

Mayer v. Butler and Nightingale

File consists of two documents: Order; and Affidavit to Hold to Bail. Defendants indebted to the Plaintiff for $104 for goods sold and delivered. Defendants about to leave the colony of Vancouver Island and Plaintiff is asking that they be apprehended.

Mayer v. Smith

File consists of two documents: summons; and affidavit of R. Bishop. Case regards action brought for the recovery of damages by the Plaintiff against the Defendant for criminal conversation with the Plaintiff's wife. Defendant and Mayer's wife left Esquimalt by way of steamer to Portland, Washington and were then living together.

McAlister to J. Greer

File consists of two documents: Affidavit of A. Meacham and Mortgage wherein, in consideration of the sum of $500, McAlister grants to Greer four horses and covered wagons and all tools and implements.

McCann v. O'Byrne

File consists of five documents: Affidavit of G.E. Dennes; Affidavit of McCann; Affidavit of Stenhouse; Affidavit of W. Culverwell; Judges Summons. Defendant is indebted to the Plaintiff for $114.55 U.S. currency being the balance due to him for 33 yards of carpeting, 10 rolls of foil cloth sold and delivered to the Defendant at his request and also the balance of rent due to him for a house he owns occupied by the Defendant

McCann v. O'Byrne

File contains: Judges Order; Affidavit of A.W. Nickels; Affidavit of J.W. Carrey; Affidavit of T. Harris; Costs; and Affidavit of F. O'Byme. The case matter is not clear. There is concern over whether or not the Defendant is about to leave Vancouver Island and the matter of his representation.

McCormack v. McField (4); Victoria; 1861.36

No. of Plaint – 837

Summons; Invoice for £7.5.10; Summons re. Execution No. 88; Bill of Costs

  • McField is summoned to appear in court to answer the Plaintiff for the total amount of £7.16.6. The amount is due for money borrowed from the Plaintiff by the Defendant. The judgment remained unsatisfied and the court has again summoned the Defendant to attend to the debt or his goods and chattels will be sold to fulfill the judgment against him.

McCutchan and Collingham v. Burns

File consists of two documents: order to hold to bail; and affidavit to hold to bail. Case regards the Plaintiff's liberty to hold the Defendant to bail for $542.22 for monies owed to him for goods sold and delivered. Additionally, the Plaintiff wants the Defendant apprehended before he leaves Victoria for San Francisco.

McDonald v. Franklin

File contains: Answers; Petition to Take Testimony. The defendant signed a contract from which it appeared that he had agreed to purchase lots #600 and #601 for an amount of money. The two parties became involved in a dispute over the actual amount.

McDonald v. Franklin

File consists of five documents: Subpoena; Injunction; Order for Injunction; Judge's Order, Order of Court to Take Testimony regarding land and lots in Victoria; the Plaintiff, at the Defendant's request, paid the sum of 104 pounds, 3 shillings and 4 pence for the purchase of lands agreed and now the Defendant refuses to pay the Plaintiff back for the conveyancing.

Results 701 to 750 of 1933