Print preview Close

Showing 1933 results

Archival description
John Keenlyside Legal Research Collection
Print preview Hierarchy View:

617 results with digital objects Show results with digital objects

Kalston v. Drabble

File consists of four documents: Judgment by Default; Bill of Costs; Summons; Affidavit of Service. Plaintiff claims $226.25 principal and interest due to him as the holder of an unpaid promissory note with the Defendant

Kamm v. Frankenstein

File contains: Order to Hold to Bail; Recognisance of Bail; Bail Piece; Appearance; Plea; Affidavit of D. Edgar; Writ of Summons; and Order. The Defendant is indebted to the Plaintiff for 34 pounds, 2 shillings, for rent of a store from the Plaintiff. It is believed that the Defendant is about to leave the colony and Plaintiff asks that he be held to bail.

Keenan v. Gallagher

File consists of four documents: judgment in non-appearance; bill of costs; and affidavit of service with copy of writ answered. Plaintiff claims $99 for debt and $12.50 for costs for money owed on an account. Defendant failed to appear.

Keenan v. Scott, operating as Daniel Scott and Co.

File consists of seven documents: affidavit to hold to bail; affidavit of R. Bishop; order to hold to bail; affidavit of J. Fall; affidavit of J.A. McCrea; affidavit of H. Nathan; and affidavit of G.I. Stewart. The Defendant is indebted to the Plaintiff for $131.25. Daniel Scott and Co., an auction house, held a sale of the effects of W. Culverwell, a bankrupt, and Mr. Scott sold certain articles to Mr. Keenan that he represented as silver. Mr. Keenan had the said articles tested and found that they were not silver as he was led to believe and he is suing to have his money returned.

Keffee v. Hart

File consists of 31 documents: (4) Affidavit of Keffee; Bill of Costs, (2) Answer to Interrogatories; (3) Writ of Summons; (3) Order to Hold to Bail; (2) Joint Affidavit of Hart and Bradley; Affidavit of Earle; Bail Piece; Affidavit of Marvin; Summons; Notice to Produce; Bail Bond; Summons, Order; Plaintiff costs on Dismissal of Summons; Record; Judgment; Record (Summons, Jury List, Particulars of Set Off). Case arising out of money payable by the Defendant to the Plaintiff for goods sold and delivered, goods bargained and sold and for money received by the Defendant for the use of the Plaintiff and for money due to the Plaintiff on accounts between them and the Plaintiff claims $800.

Kellogg v. Booth

File contains: Pleas; Summons for Time to Plead; Consent to Withdraw Plea; Consent to Judgment of Costs; Judgment by Default for Want of Plea; Affidavit for Summons for Time to Plead; and Record. The Plaintiff is suing the Defendant for 206 pounds, 3 shillings and eight pence for money lent by the Plaintiff to the Defendant and 247 pounds, eight shillings and four pence for interest on unpaid promissory notes.

Kellogg v. Peers

File consists of six documents: examination of C. Ochsmen on behalf of the Defendant; affidavit of R. Bishop, summons to examine witness; affidavit of Altruman; jury list; and court record. Case regards the Defendant owing the Plaintiff $432.75 for wages due and payable for work and labor done by the Plaintiff.

Kelly v. Jackson

File consists of 4 documents: Writ of Summons; Affidavit of Service; Plaintiff's Costs; Judgement by Default. Plaintiff claims $139.70 for debt and $17.50 for costs for goods supplied to the Defendants.

Kelly v. Moss

File consists of 2 documents: Writ of Summons; Affidavit of Service. Plaintiff claims $156.43 for debt and $40 for costs for goods supplied to the Defendants.

Kennedy et al v. Harris et al

File consists of two documents: Bill of Complaint; Bill of Complaint, Affidavits and Proceedings for the Court. the Plaintiffs are "seized in fee simple" of certain lands and hereditaments within Victoria, 22 acres, the site of the Victoria District Church and related structures. The Defendants, Harris being the Mayor of Victoria and other Defendants being members of the municipal council of Victoria, claim to have right or claim to or interest in the aforesaid premises. They claim the Plaintiffs have erected their buildings on public property and unless they are removed, they will be removed for them.

Ker v. Williams and Gibbs

File consists of three documents: Judgment in Case of Non-Appearance; Affidavit of Service of Writ with Copy of Writ Attached regarding the Royal Exchange Hotel, Ker claims to be entitled to the possession of the land and premises and wishes to eject all persons from the property

Kerr v. Harris

File contains: Answer to Complaint. Harris takes defense to the action of C. Kerr and denies that he is indebted to the Plaintiff for $4,050. He further states that the said cattle in the argument mentioned, the subject matter, was falsely and fraudulently represented to him at the time of the said pretended sale and were almost valueless for any reason, and the Defendant claims that he has been damaged to the amount of 500 pounds sterling by the Plaintiff.

Kerr v. Harris

File consists of five documents: Affidavit for Continuance; Notice of Motion for Continuance; Notice; Affidavit of Harris; Notice to Plaintiff. Trial being delayed owing to the absence of a necessary material witness

Kravi and Drake v. Kravi and Davies

File contains: Petition to Amend Bill; Affidavit of M.W. Drake; Order; and Bill of Complaint. Case regarding lots #208 and #209 in Victoria and the proper title to them. The Plaintiff had paid $50 towards the purchase, the Defendant had paid $20, but for some reason the deed was issued to the Defendant initially and then in duplicate to the Plaintiff. The Plaintiff believes that the Defendants fraudulently obtained the deed and that it ought to be delivered up to the court for cancellation.

Kwong Lee and Company vs. Sing

Affidavit of Long Chong; Steamer ticket Victoria to Hong Kong per s.s. Volmer, endorsed by stamp of "Tai Chong, Victoria".

-Mox Sing, defendant, was heavily indebted with mortgages on property in the Clinton area and apparently was trying to leave B.C. The steamer ticket was entered as evidence that he had made his plans to leave.

Laumeister v. Bowker

File consists of 2 documents: Affidavit of Bowker; Exhibit "B" - Account. Regarding the making of a track and the various amounts owed on the work. Exhibit "B" is the Defendant's account of amounts received by him out of the lands in question.

Lee v. Reid

File consists of one document: Record regarding a land lease dispute whereby the Defendant failed to renew the lease as promised and refused to allow the rent of the said premises to be fixed. Certain fixtures, erections, and buildings of the Plaintiff on the leased
premises were lost to him and the Plaintiff claims $5,000 for loss.

Leequneesh vs. Leequneesh

Affidavit of James Leequneesh regarding petition to dissolve marriage with Louisa Leequneesh because of adultery. Documents witnessed by Rev. William Duncan of Metlakatla. Petition granted by Judge Henry Crease.

Lekind v. Lewis (2); Victoria; 1861.17

No. of Plaint – 711

Summons; Invoice for £26

  • Lewis is summoned to appear in court to answer the Plaintiff for the total amount of £28.15.10. The amount is due for reversing a judgment for the Defendant in Sacramento County, California. It appears that the Plaintiff provided the Defendant with legal services for the said judgment.

Lizzie A. Milsom v. Edward Albert Sharpe, falsely called Sharpe v. Sharpe

File consists of five documents: (2) affidavit of L.A. Milsom; (2) affidavit of Mrs. Woods; petition for a decree of nulling of marriage. Case regards the Plaintiff claiming that herself and the Defendant never lived together or shared a bed. The marriage was never consumated. Mr. Sharpe was frequently intoxicated and abusive towards the petitioner, Ms. Milsom, and she wishes that marriage be immediately annulled. See 18-43 for more.

Lowe Stahleschmidt & Co. v. Robinson

Robinson was indebted to the firm of Lowe Stahleschmidt & Co. for principle and interest due to them as endorsees of a promissory note. Includes notice of service of account, account served to S.M. Nelson, summons of trader debtor, and affidavit of T.L. Stahleschmidt.

Mackenzie vs. The Corporation of Victoria

Summons; Exhibit "A"; Authority to Receive Money out of Court; Notice Record.

-The corporation's water works department laid water pipes on the Plaintiff's lands which then flooded his lands and permeated them with water, greatly depreciating his property value. The case was taken to arbitration and the Plaintiff was awarded $475 for damages or at the Defendant's expense, the draining and repairing of his property. The Defendants have not responded to the satisfaction of the Plaintiff. The Plaintiff claims $1,500 for damages.

Results 651 to 700 of 1933