Showing 1152 results

Archival description
Court Documents
Print preview Hierarchy View:
Ascending

359 results with digital objects Show results with digital objects

Michell v. Oldenburgh

File consists of three documents: Bill of Complaint; Undertaking to Abide the Order of the Court as to Costs; Order. the Plaintiff and the Defendant contributed $305 each to and were equally interested in a partnership business, ran mainly buy the Defendant. The Plaintiff has asked that the Defendant furnish him with a statement of the affairs of the partnership and that a receiver of all the assets of the said partnership may be appointed.

Michell v. Oldenburgh

File consists of 1 document: Affidavit of Michell and Bishop. The Plaintiff and Defendant had entered into a co-partnership in retail business of general merchandise in Sooke. The Plaintiff claimed that he had submitted various amounts of money to the Defendant for the purposes of the partnership to about $1,100. The Plaintiff went down to the store and discovered that the goods of the partnership were gone and had been taken to the auction house. The Defendant refused to present a detailed statement of account of the affairs of the said co-partnership to the Plaintiff.

Milby v. Heeley

File consists of four documents: Summons; Plaintiffs Costs, Affidavit of Service; Judgment by Default. Plaintiff claims $594.50 for debt, $40 for costs on an unpaid promissory note from the Defendant

Millard v. Leigh

File consists of four documents: Bill of Complaint; Affidavit of H. Courtney; Order; Defendants Costs of Opposing the Injunction. Plaintiff had rented a house in Victoria belonging to the Defendant at a monthly rent of 4100. Plaintiff made an agreement with the Defendant to cover two months rent for repairs made to the house. Defendant denies this agreement after the repairs had been made and the Plaintiff is suing for damages.

Monterio v. Waite

File consists of five documents: Affidavit of Waite; Testimony of J. Monterio; Order, Rule to Discontinue; Judges Order Allowing Appearance and Defense to Action. Defendant and Plaintiff were in a business partnership together and the Defendant Waite is indebted to the Plaintiff for $233.54 for a debt incurred while in this partnership

Montrose v. Moses (2); Victoria; 1860.26

No. of Plaint – 291

Summons; Invoice for £36.16.8

  • Moses is summoned to appear in court to answer the Plaintiff for the total amount of £38.6.4. The amount is the outstanding debt owed to the Plaintiff for labour, materials and erecting a building on Yates Street.

Montserrat v. Little

File consists of two documents: Summons; Confession of Judgment. The Defendant is indebted to the Plaintiff in the sum of 290 pounds, 4 shillings for money due from the Defendant to the Plaintiff for goods sold and delivered and for money due from the Defendant to the Plaintiff on an account stated between them

Morris v. Capron (3); Victoria; 1860.12

No. of Plaint – 337
Summons; Invoice for £1.17.6; Note to the Registrar from G.E. Dennes, the Defendant‟s attorney

  • Capron is summoned to appear in court to answer the Plaintiff for the total amount of £2.0.4. The amount appears to be owed for books sold to the Defendant.

Morton et al v. Leathers

File consists of 7 documents: Exhibit "Z" (Leather's Patent for Artificial Stone); Exhibit "A" (Receipt); Examination of P.D. Forbes; Affidavit of M.W. Drake; Order; Affidavit of E. Kelly; Notice of Motion. Case is in regards to a patent for artificial stone. It appears that the Plaintiff paid the Defendants for the patent but did not receive the notes.

Morton v. Drummond

File consists of 2 documents: Affidavit of C. Morton; Correspondence regarding Inspection of Poll Books. Morton, a hotelkeeper, is claiming the office of mayor in consequence of the illegal acts of J. Drummond. Morton and Drummond had both been candidates for the office of Mayor in Victoria by which Drummond won the election illegally.

Morton vs Drummond

Petition.

-Morton and Drummond had been candidates for election for the office of mayor holder in Victoria. Morton is charging that the list of voters used at the election for mayor was made out in a manner contrary to law and contained the names of many people who were not supposed to be on the voters list. The voters list was based on a Road Tax List, which had not been revised for the year 1874, and contained a great many names that had been put on it for the purpose of enabling them to vote. Morton charges that Drummond won the election as a result of these people that weren't supposed to be voting and asks that the election results be declared void and Drummond be removed from the position.

Murphy vs. Katz

Bond; (2) Writ of Summons; Correspondence on case; Affidavit of T. Davie; Affidavit of T.G. Murphy; Affidavit of Katz; Defendant's Costs of Suit; Issue; Judges order

The Plaintiff claims $250 for debt and $15 for costs for services performed by him as an Attorney at Law and Solicitor on behalf of the Defendant at Washington territory in the United States and for work done for the Defendant at his request.

Murray v. Campbell

File consists of two documents: affidavit of W. Muuray; and order. Defendant is indebted to the Plaintiff for $109 for goods sold and delivered. The Plaintiff is concerned that the Defendant is about to leave the colony and asks that he be apprehended.

Murray v. Cleal

File consists of four documents: Affidavit of P. Byron; Bill of Costs; Affidavit o fR. Bishop and D. Cleal; and Affidavit of R.H. Wilson. Case regards P. Byron's statement that he was intending to leave Victoria, which he was then apprehended for, was not true. Cleal claims that there were malicious motives involved and he had no intention whatsoever of leaving the colony.

Needham vs Brown

Writ of Summons; Affidavit of Service; Judgment by Default; Affidavit of W. Drake; Plaintiff's Costs.

-The Plaintiff claims $830.76 for debt and $12.50 for costs for an amount of rent due in respect of Saanich Hall farm as well as interest on arrears of rent.

Nelson to Cullis

File consists of one document: Bill of Sale. Nelson sells and transfers to Cullis a business and premises including a house and bakery known as Nelson's Bakery for consideration of the sum of $100.

Newfelder v. Dulig

File consists of 2 documents: Writ of Summons; Affidavit of Service. Plaintiff claims $372.21 principal and interest due to him as the holder of a promissory note with the Defendant.

Nicholson v. Ash

File consists of one document: Record of Plaintiff claiming money owed to him by the Defendant for goods sold and delivered and for work done and materials provided in the amount of $1,232.56 U.S. coin.

Pemberthey to Pelletier

File consists of two documents: Bill of Sale of the "Richfield Hotel" and Affidavit of Attesting Witness wherein, in consideration of the sum of $3,000, J. Pemberley bargains, sells and transfers Lot 56 in Richfield along with the hotel erected thereon.

Pidcock v. Duncan

File consists of two documents: Envelope; and Correspondence between Pidcock and the court. Duncan has been committed to prison for one week for contempt of court and failure to obey a summons.

Pidwell v. Cox & Co.

File consists of 3 documents: Summary Suit-Writ of Summons; Statement of F. Volkman; Correspondence between Cox and Colquan. Plaintiff is suing for the balance due in respect of wages on the "Pemberton Wagon Road", approximately $101.00.

Pratt v. Frain

File consists of 4 documents: Bill of Costs; Writ of Summons; Affidavit of Service; Judgement. The Plaintiff claims $171 for debt and $17 for costs as the amount due on a promissory note with the Defendant.

Results 451 to 500 of 1152